Misrepresenting Women In Comic’s And The Sins Of Guillem March

czero
Posted on: June 14th, 2012

By | Follow on Twitter

Recently DC Comic’s Artist Guillem March went and got himself in a load of soapy bubble with his anatomically impossible rendition of Catwoman for her upcoming #0 issue:

 

 

The internet had a complete breakdown as the hot topic of horrible female misrepresentation spawned further into the realms of impossible standards, overt sexualisation, sluttish renditions, negative role models, reinforcing male chauvinism in a male dominated industry and so on.

And comics have been representing women in a way that could be reflective of any of the above statements for a while now. Take these popular covers and renderings below for example, featuring some of the comic industry’s most popular female characters from Witchblade to Wonder Woman:

Now the question isn’t just one of are comics sexist towards women. They clearly are. The question is also one of where does that sexism begin and end?

A lot of fans are okay with the sexualisation of their favorite characters, indeed it would almost seem part and parcel of the fantastical and mostly unrealistic nature of comics themselves.  The easiest way to show this is with Cosplay:

With Cosplay fans get to revel in the sexy appearance and nature of the fantasy characters they enjoy reading about. They get to flaunt that freedom and regularly attend cons to do so. So at what point does an artists rendition of an overtly sexy comic book character become chauvinistic, sexist, harmful etc.

Is it at the point where they are depicted in a pose that is unrealistic like Guillem March’s Catwoman above? Or is this just an isolated attack on the artist based on artistic liberties he’s taken in an (albeit changing) industry where fantasy renderings like this are the norm?

Is it at the point where the characters are overly sexualised and objectified? Or is this argument nullified by the same characters being showcased by enthusiastic cosplayer’s who enjoy them in comics and enjoy the freedom of showcasing their own sexiness?

Or is it at the point where male creators have taken liberties with female characters in an industry that is mostly male dominated? And if so does this mean that female creators, fans and Cosplayers are also culpable for their continued support and endorsing of an industry that has been shown itself sexist?

I’m throwing the forums open to anyone and everyone with an opinion and we’d love to hear what you think on FaceBook, Twitter or the comments section below.

This issue is clearly a biggie, so sound off and tell us what you think about it.

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Articles from around the web you may also enjoy:

Related Dirt

Read more by | Follow on Twitter

Comments
  • http://www.facebook.com/UfunkAlpha Uriah Funk

    And over in Europe they are progressing and moving forward in things like engineering and genetics cause they already went through puberty and got over the childish “OMG boobs!” phase

  • Bad Man

    With the perpetuity of sexualised female characters in comics (star fire, Witchblade etc.) do you think taking men’s visualisation of this out of the equation would lessen the problem?

    Or do you thinks its the case that women (and also men) are unrealistically represented in comics, by in most cases men, and this is an active selling point for a predominantly male audience, but also females too?

    Would comics be as appealing if you removed that fantasy element, and conversely, when women sexualise men, in Urban Fantasy for example, is that as equally impermissible, or is it acceptable due to the difference in the mediums as prose is less visual than cover art?: http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?num=10&um=1&hl=en&safe=off&rlz=1C1CHPT_en-gbGB473GB477&biw=1366&bih=600&tbm=isch&tbnid=XBQM3pvSrZpngM:&imgrefurl=http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/fire-king-marjorie-m-liu/1100562310&docid=kBB8gbTXkPXJsM&imgurl=http://img2.imagesbn.com/images/147700000/147707361.JPG&w=294&h=475&ei=G4PbT6b6GMfb8QPFvYCVCw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=819&vpy=98&dur=934&hovh=285&hovw=177&tx=84&ty=149&sig=110194719962761586258&sqi=2&page=1&tbnh=123&tbnw=70&start=0&ndsp=30&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:0,i:88

    Inquiring minds want to know :)

  • http://twitter.Abby_Chandler Abigail Chandler

    Hmm, cosplay is an interesting one. Does it perpetuate the sexualisation of women in comics? Well, I’ve been known to cosplay myself and once spent an entire day running around in my pants and some fishnets as Zatanna (but with the shirt buttoned up to my neck – as all good girls know, it’s legs or cleavage, never both). It could be seen as a sexy costume. But I posed for photos with a grin on my face and my hands on my hips, not peering over my shoulder with my arse in the air. Most of the cosplayers I’ve met have enjoyed the fantasy and sense of power that comes from dressing as a superhero, they haven’t consciously dressed that way to be ‘sexy’. Often, it’s not the costume that’s the problem with female comic characters, it’s the way they’re drawn. In the case of Catwoman, Darwyn Cooke draws her as a smart, capable, dangerous woman in a detective noir style, and she’s all the sexier for it. Guillem March draws her as a blow-up doll.

    Having said that, there are always cosplayers that are doing it for the attention they get from men – but that’s fine, that’s their decision. Perhaps the difference between sexualised cosplay and sexualised comics characters is that one is a conscious decision from a woman who wants to show off her body, and the other is a decision by (generally) a man to draw all women in a sexually objectified way.